Project Management in Urban Design

Basics

Intro

Teaser: Basics
Theoretical-conceptual basics

Modes of Play

Coming into Play

Motive
Mobilising the brief
Lists
Processing Contingency
Coming into Play
Moving Fences

Play?

State of the art in research

How to Play

Preliminary Practice
Refining the Question
Intervene

Play

Doing

Baseline Survey
Organizing Agencies
Mini Golf

Reflecting

Importing Knowledge
Reflecting
Project Management

Recording

Making Videos
Notations

Displaying

Research Wall
Closing Ceremony

Understanding the Play

Moving beyond the question
Propositions in archives
A matter of re-assembling
Reflective Review: Begegnen

Project Closure

Project Closure

Repository

Sort by:

Entry date Issue date Category

Filter by: All (36)
–
–

Category: conception (15×) description (8×) manual (4×) reference (5×) synthesis (3×)
Contributors: Alexander Römer (2×) Andreas Meichner (1×) Anna Richter (3×) Anna-Sophie Seum (4×) Annika Bauer (3×) Atena Mahjoub (1×) Bernd Kniess (5×) Christopher Dell (4×) Diana Schäffer (4×) Dominique Peck (19×) Flora Fessler (2×) Franziska Dehm (1×) Johannes Schöckle (4×) Juliane Bötel (3×) Kirsten Plöhn (2×) Lena Enne (5×) Maja Momic (1×) Mareike Oberheim (4×) Marian Rudhart (3×) Marie Therese Jakoubek (1×) Marius Töpfer (1×) Milena Stoldt (1×) Negin Jahangiri (4×) Nina Manz (1×) Olena Pudova (3×) Pascal Scheffer (1×) Rebecca Wall (2×) Ronja Scholz (4×) Tomma Groth (1×) Yohanna Bund (1×)
Keywords: "Projects" (5×) action (1×) Communication (1×) Design (3×) Dokumentation (7×) Expertinnen des Alltags (1×) matters of form (3×) medium (4×) Minimal Structure (1×) notation (3×) planning (2×) problematisation (1×) Rothenburgsort (1×) stadtteilöffentlich (1×) Uncertainty (1×)

Dominique Peck has joined the Research and Teaching Programme Urban Design’s academic staff at HafenCity University in 2015. Being a UD alumni, his work has a focus on project management, design development and transposing formats in research, teaching and practice. Dominique was co-project managing the live project Building a Proposition for Future Activities and is now focused on his PhD Project Re-positioning Project Management in Urban Design.

Bernd Kniess is an architect and urban planner. Since 2008 he is Professor for Urban Design at HafenCity Universität Hamburg where he established the Master Programme Urban Design. He is interested in the negotiation of the contemporary city, whose planning principles he aims to diagrammatically describe and transfer into a relational practice as procedure.

Public space is where public life unfolds!
Stadtteilbeirat Rothenburgsort
Issues
The evening before
Exposé
Unbuilding
The Community of Deconstruction
From disciplines to disciplining
Learning from Las Vegas
Everyday Urbanism
Urban Design
Administered World
Open Form
Project Archaeology
Facilitate Uncertainty
Rules of Play
Workshop: Infrastructure
Cooperative Review Process
Project Days
Planänderung
Mediators
Conception
Interviews
Coproduction
Reflective Review
Performance
Talking Billebogen Atlas
Talking Stadteingang Elbbrücken
21. Situationen Rothenburgsort
Annäherungen an was?
Tod dem Projekt! Lang lebe der systemische Wandel
New Commons for Europe
Allesandersplatz
Die Stadt als offene Partitur
Give me a gun and I will make all buildings move

Play

Building a Proposition for Future Activities

Transposition 1: Project vs. Project Days
Transposition 2: Project Days vs. Planning Competition
Transposition 3: Planning Competition vs. Jury
Transposition 7: Completion of service phase 2 vs. Project Execution
References
HCU
HOOU
Imprint
Cooperative Review Process
Column A
Christopher Dell, Bernd Kniess, Dominique Peck, und Marko Mijatovic. 2016. “Documentation of the Cooperative Review Process Building a Proposition for Future Activities.” Basics: Project Management in Urban Design. Hamburg. CC BY-SA 4.0.
About column A

Members of the civil society initiative help guide through the neighbourhood and show their self-built community building, before all participants of the planning competition receive helmets to take part in a guided tour through the Ohlendieckshöhe construction project in the Accommodation with Perspective Dwelling programme. Back in the big tent, the prepared lunch is served before the members of the process management of the planning competition present the task. At the end of the first day, the approximately 60 participants are divided into five mixed groups along their pre-qualifications and the project leaders are drawn by lots. The project leaders are all member of architecture offices that have been selected and invited by the project and steering group of the project Begegnungshaus Poppenbüttel and who have all been involved in self-construction and participation procedures. On the second of a total of seven days, work begins in the project offices. The project offices are a form coproduction that provides different people and working groups with an infrastructure, starting with such basic things as electricity, model building materials and breakfast, lunches and dinners for the participants and partly also their relatives, friends and families. Similarly, the organisation of the financial and legal framework is also at stake, as was demonstrated by the example of the participation confirmations, the additional expense allowances for voluntary work and internship certificates.

Each project office works on the task in the planning competition according to its own design approaches. The participants get to know each other through narratives, draw a network of existing capacities, go directly into the elaboration of possible design approaches on different scales in model making (1:200 to 1:1), draw on sketch paper or the PC. Every evening a project office is responsible for dinner and a presentation of the work. Within a week there are kitchens from Switzerland, Japan, the Middle East, Belgium and Germany; the ingredients are bought in the vicinity of the project area and prepared and served in the large tent in the kitchen from the project days.

On the final day of the summer school (project days and cooperative review process), all project offices set up their displays for the intermediate colloquium, while photographers from the daily press get an idea of the situation. The process management explains the experimental arrangement of the intermediate colloquium. In contrast to the usual forms of planning competitions, the cooperative review process allows all participants to exchange ideas and insights into each other's contributions. Different competencies and procedures become visible in this way, which invites the leaders of the project offices to signal their willingness to contribute to the possible realisation of a project. Instead of five competing entries, the project office discuss how they could work on one joint competition entry. The participants of the project offices let the visitors of the summer festival of Poppenbüttel hilft e.V. see their designs for the Poppenbüttel meeting house.

Metadata
Issue date: 11/07/2018
Entry date: 10/06/2020
Contributors: Dominique Peck Bernd Kniess
Keywords: "Projects"
pdf
Related Content
  • Transposition 3: Planning Competition vs. Jury
  • Transposition 7: Completion of service phase 2 vs. Project Execution