Project Management in Urban Design

Basics

Intro

Teaser: Basics
Theoretical-conceptual basics

Modes of Play

Coming into Play

Motive
Mobilising the brief
Lists
Processing Contingency
Coming into Play
Moving Fences

Play?

State of the art in research

How to Play

Preliminary Practice
Refining the Question
Intervene

Play

Doing

Baseline Survey
Organizing Agencies
Mini Golf

Reflecting

Importing Knowledge
Reflecting
Project Management

Recording

Making Videos
Notations

Displaying

Research Wall
Closing Ceremony

Understanding the Play

Moving beyond the question
Propositions in archives
A matter of re-assembling
Reflective Review: Begegnen

Project Closure

Project Closure

Repository

Sort by:

Entry date Issue date Category

Filter by: All (36)
–
–

Category: conception (15×) description (8×) manual (4×) reference (5×) synthesis (3×)
Contributors: Alexander Römer (2×) Andreas Meichner (1×) Anna Richter (3×) Anna-Sophie Seum (4×) Annika Bauer (3×) Atena Mahjoub (1×) Bernd Kniess (5×) Christopher Dell (4×) Diana Schäffer (4×) Dominique Peck (19×) Flora Fessler (2×) Franziska Dehm (1×) Johannes Schöckle (4×) Juliane Bötel (3×) Kirsten Plöhn (2×) Lena Enne (5×) Maja Momic (1×) Mareike Oberheim (4×) Marian Rudhart (3×) Marie Therese Jakoubek (1×) Marius Töpfer (1×) Milena Stoldt (1×) Negin Jahangiri (4×) Nina Manz (1×) Olena Pudova (3×) Pascal Scheffer (1×) Rebecca Wall (2×) Ronja Scholz (4×) Tomma Groth (1×) Yohanna Bund (1×)
Keywords: "Projects" (5×) action (1×) Communication (1×) Design (3×) Dokumentation (7×) Expertinnen des Alltags (1×) matters of form (3×) medium (4×) Minimal Structure (1×) notation (3×) planning (2×) problematisation (1×) Rothenburgsort (1×) stadtteilöffentlich (1×) Uncertainty (1×)

Dominique Peck has joined the Research and Teaching Programme Urban Design’s academic staff at HafenCity University in 2015. Being a UD alumni, his work has a focus on project management, design development and transposing formats in research, teaching and practice. Dominique was co-project managing the live project Building a Proposition for Future Activities and is now focused on his PhD Project Re-positioning Project Management in Urban Design.

Bernd Kniess is an architect and urban planner. Since 2008 he is Professor for Urban Design at HafenCity Universität Hamburg where he established the Master Programme Urban Design. He is interested in the negotiation of the contemporary city, whose planning principles he aims to diagrammatically describe and transfer into a relational practice as procedure.

Public space is where public life unfolds!
Stadtteilbeirat Rothenburgsort
Issues
The evening before
Exposé
Unbuilding
The Community of Deconstruction
From disciplines to disciplining
Learning from Las Vegas
Everyday Urbanism
Urban Design
Administered World
Open Form
Project Archaeology
Facilitate Uncertainty
Rules of Play
Workshop: Infrastructure
Cooperative Review Process
Project Days
Planänderung
Mediators
Conception
Interviews
Coproduction
Reflective Review
Performance
Talking Billebogen Atlas
Talking Stadteingang Elbbrücken
21. Situationen Rothenburgsort
Annäherungen an was?
Tod dem Projekt! Lang lebe der systemische Wandel
New Commons for Europe
Allesandersplatz
Die Stadt als offene Partitur
Give me a gun and I will make all buildings move

Play

Building a Proposition for Future Activities

Transposition 1: Project vs. Project Days
Transposition 2: Project Days vs. Planning Competition
Transposition 3: Planning Competition vs. Jury
Transposition 7: Completion of service phase 2 vs. Project Execution
References
HCU
HOOU
Imprint
Project Archaeology
Column A
Start the video at 1:14:41 to hear Jacques Herzog talk about how the architectural office Herzog & de Meuron is working on the documentation of the megaproject Elbphilharmonie. Jacques Herzog and Peter Eisenman, moderated by Carson Chan Milstein Hall, Cornell University, College of Architecture, Art and Planning September 11, 2013

The teaching and research program Urban Design has worked with the University of Neighborhoods on what it means to work as a university on urban development. One of the employees at Herzog & de Meuron, who worked on the megaproject Elbphilharmonie, together with the UoN team, organised the tree house workshops in intercultural practice seminar format. The documentation of the seminars forms the basis for the Round Table Redesign "What is urban Design to do in the Age of uncertainty?" with Christopher Dell, Bernd Kniess and Philipp Löper. The Round Table Re-design is part of the publication Tom Paints the Fence. The short excerpt here is intended to illustrate how the aspects of the production of a project archaeology relate to the demands already made on actors involved in the design of urban form in project work.

Bernd Kniess: When it comes to which actors are involved in a process such as dealing with indeterminacy, we are dealing with a question that Phillip Löper also experienced in the Elbphilharmonie megaproject. We know from the press that there were numerous conflict situations. In a conversation with Peter Eisenmann, Jacques Herzog even talks about the fact that the architectural firm Herzog & de Meuron also came into economic difficulties. How can actors in complex situations learn from processes and restructure them accordingly?
Philip Löper: These are stuck situations. Someone makes an accusation that has to be legally refuted on the other side without making new accusations possible. In doing so, one always proceeds with the attitude that a compromise is a defeat, because then it is no longer about the matter at hand. It is incredibly difficult to understand these processes first.
Christopher Dell: The University of Neighbourhoods is a comparatively small project. But if we want to address this concern in the curriculum, city planners, architects, cultural and social scientists and probably a few more, can practice learning processes here in order to be able to upscale the process in the following – in interaction with what you definitely need to know and be able to do in a disciplinary manner. That should run parallel, the disciplinary level and the learning of process reading.

About column A
Römer, Alexander and Marko Mijatovic. 2016. “Notations on site.” Basics: Project Management in Urban Design. Hamburg. CC BY-SA 4.0.
Dell, Christopher and Marko Mijatovic. 2016. “Notations on site.” Basics: Project Management in Urban Design. Hamburg. CC BY-SA 4.0.

The term “project archaeology” for us describes a technique for reading structural traces of projective processes and thereby multiplying the directions of a project’s time (and content) vectors. It is clear that a documented process is a temporal entity that happened in the past. It thus seems to be a closed entity although in its becoming it was an open one. The dilemma now is that when the process is read as closed entity, the potentialities of the process itself get lost. Consequently, in order to open up the process again and to regain its immanent potentialities, we work with a diagrammatic approach of a serial fragmentation, de- and re-assembling, cataloguing and indexing of the process structures. Rather than looking for representational effects, we look in the document archive for traces that incorporate new beginnings and for structural entities that can be re-assembled.

Dell, Christopher and Marko Mijatovic. 2016. “Project Archaeology.” Basics: Project Management in Urban Design. Hamburg. CC BY-SA 4.0.
Metadata
Issue date: 01/03/2019
Entry date: 10/06/2020
Contributors: Christopher Dell Alexander Römer Bernd Kniess
Keywords: notation
pdf
Related Content
  • Transposition 1: Project vs. Project Days
  • Transposition 2: Project Days vs. Planning Competition
  • Transposition 3: Planning Competition vs. Jury
  • Transposition 7: Completion of service phase 2 vs. Project Execution