Project Management in Urban Design

Basics

Intro

Teaser: Basics
Theoretical-conceptual basics

Modes of Play

Coming into Play

Motive
Mobilising the brief
Lists
Processing Contingency
Coming into Play
Moving Fences

Play?

State of the art in research

How to Play

Preliminary Practice
Refining the Question
Intervene

Play

Doing

Baseline Survey
Organizing Agencies
Mini Golf

Reflecting

Importing Knowledge
Reflecting
Project Management

Recording

Making Videos
Notations

Displaying

Research Wall
Closing Ceremony

Understanding the Play

Moving beyond the question
Propositions in archives
A matter of re-assembling
Reflective Review: Begegnen

Project Closure

Project Closure

Repository

Sort by:

Entry date Issue date Category

Filter by: All (36)
–
–

Category: conception (15×) description (8×) manual (4×) reference (5×) synthesis (3×)
Contributors: Alexander Römer (2×) Andreas Meichner (1×) Anna Richter (3×) Anna-Sophie Seum (4×) Annika Bauer (3×) Atena Mahjoub (1×) Bernd Kniess (5×) Christopher Dell (4×) Diana Schäffer (4×) Dominique Peck (19×) Flora Fessler (2×) Franziska Dehm (1×) Johannes Schöckle (4×) Juliane Bötel (3×) Kirsten Plöhn (2×) Lena Enne (5×) Maja Momic (1×) Mareike Oberheim (4×) Marian Rudhart (3×) Marie Therese Jakoubek (1×) Marius Töpfer (1×) Milena Stoldt (1×) Negin Jahangiri (4×) Nina Manz (1×) Olena Pudova (3×) Pascal Scheffer (1×) Rebecca Wall (2×) Ronja Scholz (4×) Tomma Groth (1×) Yohanna Bund (1×)
Keywords: "Projects" (5×) action (1×) Communication (1×) Design (3×) Dokumentation (7×) Expertinnen des Alltags (1×) matters of form (3×) medium (4×) Minimal Structure (1×) notation (3×) planning (2×) problematisation (1×) Rothenburgsort (1×) stadtteilöffentlich (1×) Uncertainty (1×)

Dominique Peck has joined the Research and Teaching Programme Urban Design’s academic staff at HafenCity University in 2015. Being a UD alumni, his work has a focus on project management, design development and transposing formats in research, teaching and practice. Dominique was co-project managing the live project Building a Proposition for Future Activities and is now focused on his PhD Project Re-positioning Project Management in Urban Design.

Bernd Kniess is an architect and urban planner. Since 2008 he is Professor for Urban Design at HafenCity Universität Hamburg where he established the Master Programme Urban Design. He is interested in the negotiation of the contemporary city, whose planning principles he aims to diagrammatically describe and transfer into a relational practice as procedure.

Public space is where public life unfolds!
Stadtteilbeirat Rothenburgsort
Issues
The evening before
Exposé
Unbuilding
The Community of Deconstruction
From disciplines to disciplining
Learning from Las Vegas
Everyday Urbanism
Urban Design
Administered World
Open Form
Project Archaeology
Facilitate Uncertainty
Rules of Play
Workshop: Infrastructure
Cooperative Review Process
Project Days
Planänderung
Mediators
Conception
Interviews
Coproduction
Reflective Review
Performance
Talking Billebogen Atlas
Talking Stadteingang Elbbrücken
21. Situationen Rothenburgsort
Annäherungen an was?
Tod dem Projekt! Lang lebe der systemische Wandel
New Commons for Europe
Allesandersplatz
Die Stadt als offene Partitur
Give me a gun and I will make all buildings move

Play

Building a Proposition for Future Activities

Transposition 1: Project vs. Project Days
Transposition 2: Project Days vs. Planning Competition
Transposition 3: Planning Competition vs. Jury
Transposition 7: Completion of service phase 2 vs. Project Execution
References
HCU
HOOU
Imprint
Interviews
Column A

The interview as one of the methods of empirical urban research is hardly used in the practice of project management. In the course of the project, there are often opportunities for bilateral discussions to coordinate principles and motives or very concrete aspects of implementation. However, it should be clear to the project manager that an interview, unlike a discussion, must be methodical. This repository entry offers a first introduction. Further aspects can be found in handbooks and scientific journals. A selection of these can be found in the references below and other articles.

About column A

Every interview is an opportunity to collect information and an impro-drama with an unfolding plot (Hermanns 2000). This impro-drama is actively and relationally produced by all participants; however, the interviewer is confronted with a special design task in relation to the project’s general interplay, the project’s motive and its past and future.
Pitfalls are most likely to appear because, …
• the conduct of doing interviews is vague; in particular so in urban design projects, which can be described as liminary organisations operating in, across and beyond established practices. The interviewer/project manager does not own a Babel Fish.

Babel Fish - The Oddest Thing In The Universe - The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy - BBC

• This vagueness is problematic, because the expectations of the interview to make a substantial contribution to the research project are high
• The dilemma ubiquitous in project management in Urban Design, of course, also plays a role in the process of conducting interviews: (self-)representation. The interviewer may not be able to represent him/herself as informed as s/he considers himself about the knowing-how and knowing-why of the project in order to conduct the interview. The task to collect information and the crucial thematic interest of the interview may even be in opposition to a fair process of conducting the interview with the interviewee.
Interviews as action: research-practical aspects
In projects in Urban Design interviewees are often project partners and thus will appreciate your professional approach to gain, prolong or rebuild their trust during particular project phases.
Before the interview – Access to the field and selection of interviews
• Specify issues and research interests, and use/translate methods, tools and theories relationally
• “Acquire” interviewees
The project Begegnungshaus Poppenbüttel is a model project funded by the Hamburg Parliament. Active stakeholders of the different operative and decision-making levels may secretly seek or even openly articulate the wish for return of investment of resources such as attention, money, labor, knowledge etc. from interviews and a positive representation of the interview in the project’s documentation/evaluation. A clearly organized, communicated and approved research concept will support, but not guarantee a fair and sound process of conducting interviews. The professional project manager in Urban Design must be able to operate in a setting in which all active stakeholders are experts in their own right and field and may not refrain from transgressing fields of competence.
• Arrange times, spaces and topics for the series of interviews
• Design productive interview settings. Semi-structured questions and a well-functioning infrastructure can be very conducive once the impro-drama unfolds as well as in post-production
• Agree on the use of a recording device (audio and/or video) including all pertinent declarations and information about archiving capacities
• Ethics is key
All work done before the interview must offer the interviewee a crystal–clear understanding of his/her role to enable the production of knowledge. We recommend doing this in the form of a briefing, which typically answers the following questions:
• What is at issue? Clearly explain your interest and rationale of the interview, outline themes
• How is the production process organized and what happens with the produced material?
• What is the (spatial) setting? Where is the interview conducted?
• Who conducts the interview?
• Who is present during the interview?
Qualitative interviews are typically conducted in an everyday space of the interviewee with the intention to best represent his/her situation. However, if a particular setting or plot – a walk around a construction site, looking at media – might appear more reasonable, the interviewer should feel free to arrange for alternative settings.
• How long is the interview going to be?
Time capacities in late capitalism are notoriously scarce. Interviews can last from 30 minutes up to an afternoon. Issues around transcription, translation, varying capacities for articulation, willingness to communicate, preparation etc. may have effects on the duration of the interview, so it is helpful to mock interview a friend or colleague to gain a sense of how the questions work and how long the interview approximately takes.
During the interview
• Set the stage
• Make room for not one, but multiple roles enacted by the interviewer and the interviewee. Someone who works for an employer acts in the interests of the employer, but also "the cause", his career, according to what the media or his social environment says and so on. These are partly overlapping and not always converging roles. Of interest here is a difference between what the interviewees say they have done and what they have actually done.
• Develop and maintain a professional position in the setting. Sharing specific positions must not be complicit, disagreement must not be hostile. Put yourself in a position to hear and bear any statement.
• Empathy and naivety are a slight control you may employ to illustrate matters of course and their respective meanings in relation to the process of the interview

After the interview
Project Management in Urban Design operationalises analyses techniques from grounded theory.

Research Methods. Qualitative analysis of interview data

We are documenting interviews using a video camera operated by a camera man or woman. He or she is not only responsible for the proper operation of his/her gear and the production of the material, but, in order to do so, must manage the interviewee’s position in and relation to the setting or spatial display. If this is not managed properly it might affect the interviewee’s disposition to talk and thus could render the interviews useless in relation to the project’s motive. Here the interviewer and/or the camera man or woman can make use of capacities entailed in the videos production processes. Videos are typically produced in takes and put together in the editing room following the interview. The interviewer and/or the cameraman can indicate that the interviewee can speak with ease and use colloquial spoken language. The initially agreed briefing must entail a statement about ethics as a matter of postproduction.

Werner Herzog interviews Hank Skinner - Death Row Conversations

Werner Herzog is aware of the numerous intermediaries of an interview. The videos of his portraits of prison inmates reveal the situation of the interviewees and the related circumstances of the interviews. In this series, Herzog works along the question of whether the prison inmates should be executed. The content of this question is far removed from project management, but it is meant to represent the display and understanding of ethical aspects in projects. For example, interviews on the accommodation and housing practices of refugees may very well deal with deportation, terror or similar issues. Herzog's interview series is meant to stand for the fact that through interviews we can learn about aspects of how individual actors’ worldview is related to others.

The above outlined aspects and more render the knowing-how of conducting interviews as part of an urban design project and thus as part of the repertoire required to produce spatial displays of knowledge production that communicate the intended modes of representation as being ‘in the air’.

Metadata
Issue date: 09/24/2018
Entry date: 10/06/2020
Contributors: Dominique Peck
Keywords: Communication
pdf
Related Content
  • Transposition 1: Project vs. Project Days
References

Hermanns, Harry. 2000. „Interviewen als Tätigkeit“. In Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch, edited by Uwe Flick, Ernst von Kardorff, and Ines Steinke, 360–67. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.